Case 1: Irama Pte Ltd v Formark Scaffolding (Holdings) Ltd
Active / Appeal PendingCourt/Forum
London County Court, London High Court, Appeals Office
Claim/Case No.
H26YX017, KA-2024-000031, CA-2025-000621 A/B/C
Status
Active / Appeal Pending
Overview
This case concerns Irama Pte Ltd's dispute with Formark Scaffolding (Holdings) Ltd arising from an unpaid rent debt and related proceedings that have generated extensive procedural activity. Irama's position is that significant issues have been determined through procedural steps and costs litigation rather than through a full merits trial, and that official insolvency records and administrator communications are central to understanding the dispute.
Key Points
The following points document specific issues, findings, and matters in dispute within this case. Each point links to detailed evidence and primary sources.
Disruptive Directors Described as Disruptive in a Court Record
Court-described disruption finding referenced to the judgment. Directors characterized as disruptive in 2017 court record.
Administrator Filing - Irwin Mitchell Described as Non-Responsive/Unhelpful
Administrator record describing non-responsive/unhelpful conduct. Official Companies House filing.
"Offset Agreement" Narrative Disputed by Administrator
Offset agreement narrative disputed by administrator. Alleged contradictions in court submissions.
Signing / Attendance by an Unauthorised Person
Use of an unauthorised person to sign/attend. Contested legal issue regarding document signing and hearing attendance.
Costs Escalation: Nearly £500,000 Costs in a £65,000 Rent Dispute
Nearly £500,000 in costs generated in a £65,000 rent dispute. Analysis of billing pressures and cost drivers.